ADVERTISEMENT

There is a lot of talk about replacing Stave

Which is a more realistic outcome via Minnesota?

  • Stave does a better job of handling difficult down and distance

    Votes: 3 42.9%
  • The offense does a better job of running the ball

    Votes: 4 57.1%

  • Total voters
    7

AquaBadger

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Jun 21, 2001
9,718
6,288
113
Northwestern was frustrating. But lets review:

Stave is who he is. When Stave can use play action he can be effective. When Stave can't use play action he isn't effective. When UW is behind the chains and can't run effectively, Stave can't effectively use play action and is often ineffective.

The offense is what it is. We can't run consistency. We aren't a threat to consistently move the ball on the ground.

For us to win, either we need one of the two to do something different.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back