What bothers me is when people downgrade guys like Locke and Moss because they are 3 stars. C'mon they are 2 years away! Who thinks that they will get AT LEAST another star in the next 2 years? A 3 star as a sophomore is incredible! If they are downgraded, I'd be concerned, but when some posters say "well, they're only 3 stars", how many sophomores are solid 3 stars? They have time to get upgraded, and honestly, if the staff feels that they are worthy, who am I to disagree? By the time they are senior's, I would expect them to be 4-5 stars. jmo